Tim Harlow at the Star Tribune uses my anecdote from a streets.mn post Do Not Wait Here (but does not link to it, as apparently must be Strib policy, lest someone think that there were other points of view on the internet). He did email to ask permission, to which I said: “I will just say you can quote my blog and there must be better designs.”
The article then misses the point that there is a design failure, and instead resorts to the standard official trope “Safety is a Shared Responsibility”, bureaucracy speak meaning blame the pedestrian. Of course pedestrians should behave better. But so should agencies. The LRT design, even more so than road designs from 1920s forward, is about reigning in pedestrians into fenced regions, so they do not interfere with the operation of the train. Designing a semi-permeable environment with multiple modes at multiple speeds and braking distances are difficult, which is why LRT is so, so dangerous compared to bus, but given current transit vehicle fetishes, one would hope the designers would get better with the actual design.
Paint is a wonderful thing, but self-explaining designs are better. A faux median is hardly self-explaining.
You must be logged in to post a comment.